Pressure to Return to Sport After Injury Peer Reviewed Articles
Indian J Orthop. 2017 Sep-Oct; 51(v): 529–536.
Current Concepts in Sports Injury Rehabilitation
Himmat Dhillon
Medwest Health Intendance, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Sidak Dhilllon
1 Department of Sports Medicine, Sri Ramachandra Medical University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, Bharat
Mandeep S Dhillon
2 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Concrete Medicine and Rehabilitation Medicine, Sports Injury Dispensary, PGIMER, Chandigarh, Republic of india
Abstract
In the modernistic era, rehabilitation subsequently sports injury has get a domain for specialists, and its evolution has necessarily brought together the sports physiotherapist, the sports doc, and the orthopedic surgeon. The irresolute profile of sports related injury, as well as limited availability of facilities for rehabilitation in many areas of India, is a matter of business organization. Elite sportspersons have some protection, but the average athlete is often left to fend for himself. Key factors in successful sports injury rehabilitation protocols are the application of modern rehabilitation protocols nether advisable supervision, appropriate and well timed surgical interventions, and judicious and need based utilize of pharmaceutical agents. Modern rehabilitation protocols emphasize teamwork and proper rehabilitation planning, and the rehabilitation team has to be lead by a trained sports physiotherapist, with an agreement of the protocols and interventions required at diverse stages. Injury specific rehabilitation protocols are being practiced worldwide but need to be introduced co-ordinate to the nature of the sport also as available facilities. Fifty-fifty in India, sports physicians are increasingly joining specialist rehabilitation teams, and they can help with medication, nutritional supplements, and specialized tests that could amend injury understanding. Inputs from surgeons are mandatory if surgical interventions have been performed. What is often missing in the underdeveloped world is psychological support and a clear agreement by the athlete of his/her rehabilitation protocols. World over, the primary aims are safe return to sports and minimizing reinjury on render to sport; this involves rehabilitation in stages, and current methodology clearly demarcates acute and chronic phases of injury. Close coordination with trainers and coaches is mandatory, and all need to sympathise that the reconditioning phase is crucial; skill assessment before progression has now become a specialized domain and needs to be introduced at all levels of the sport. A fundamental gene in all sports injury rehabilitation protocols is injury prevention; this involves data maintenance by teams or trainers, which is still non fully developed in the Indian context. The injury and subsequent problems need to exist comprehended both by athletes and their coaches. The current review is an attempt to analyze some of the problems that are important and routinely used globe over, with the aim to improving rehabilitation after sports fifty-fifty in the underdeveloped globe.
Keywords: Conditioning, physiotherapy, return to sports, sports injury, sports rehabilitation
MeSH terms: Athletic injuries, sports injuries, recovery of function, rehabilitation
Introduction
The ever growing popularity of sports worldwide has fabricated the "sports industry" extremely competitive and financially lucrative for athletes, with many striving for aristocracy professionalism. This has consequently intensified the concrete and emotional burden of sports, increased the grooming and practice regimens required, and exposed those involved in this quest to a higher take a chance of injury. In modern competitive sport, injured athletes are under pressure to return to competition as early as possible, which is often a demand for both the sportsperson and the team management. Athletes also stand a chance of losing their place in the team due to the highly competitive scenario and naturally come under college pressures to return. Thus, compared to traditional rehabilitation after injury, sports injuries rehabilitation requires more than care, a highly structured and sports-specific approach, which should prepare both the athlete and the injured tissue for the following physical and psychological demands at the highest level of sport.
The growing popularity of the recently incepted hockey, football game, and kabaddi leagues in India is evidence of a growing sports civilisation in a country predominantly favoring cricket. These sports are fast paced, played over a short timeline, and often pose a high fatigue and injury risk to the involved athletes. Studies from effectually the world emphasize the relation between the demands of the sport and the risks of injury.one Unfortunately, the lack of enquiry and literature regarding structured programs addressing injury direction and prevention in Indian athletes shows bear witness that our state is defective in the area in comparison to more than developed countries such as the Great britain, the United states of america, and Australia. A PubMed search using cardinal words such as "Sports AND Injury AND Rehabilitation AND Bharat" gave 26 citations, none of which was relevant, nor did any draw the topic nether review. A PubMed search using primal words such equally "Sports AND Injury AND Rehabilitation AND Current Concepts" gave 79 hits, most of which were non specific to sports injury rehabilitation, and none of which was by an Indian writer or focused on Indian athletes.
This article attempts to update the sports rehabilitation personnel nearly bachelor options and need based interventions for athletes, which could be applied even in the underdeveloped world.
Epidemiology
Injuries in sport can occur through contact or noncontact mechanisms and maybe of an astute or overuse nature.2 They may involve muscle, ligaments, or bone, with stress fractures beingness somewhat unique to sports and overuse. Epidemiological studies take revealed no pregnant decrease in sports-related injuries over the past ii decades, despite the heightened insight into injury mechanisms, prevention programs, and load monitoring techniques in athletes. In a written report spanning over xvi years, Hootman et al.3 observed collegiate athletes in 15 different sports in the U.s.a.. Their results concluded that lower limb injuries accounted for >50% of all sports injuries, with the knee and talocrural joint being predominantly involved. The bulk of the injuries were contact injuries, with significantly college numbers existence observed during competition compared to training injuries. Of the 15 sports, they analyzed that football (Gridiron) had the highest injury charge per unit with competitive wrestling being the second largest. Over the 16-year period, the authors also observed that the increased physical demand, participation, and alter of rules had a substantial effect on injury trends.
A prime number case of such a correlation between injury trends and the demand for the sport is evident on observing the changing injury profile in aristocracy level cricketers since the introduction of the shorter, yet physically demanding, T20 format of the game. Dhillon et al.iv showed a 16.8% incidence of upper limb injury, primarily during fielding, in a prospective evaluation of cricketers. Over the past 10 cricket seasons, Orchard et al.5 found that hamstring and thigh injuries are now the most common injuries seen in elite cricket, which they attribute to the change in the format of the game. Tirabassi et al.six concluded that of all the sporting injuries that led to disqualification on medical grounds, threescore% were suffered during contest. Over an 8-twelvemonth observation, the authors demonstrated lower limb injuries to be the about predominant with the highest incidence in football followed by gymnastics and wrestling. The site of injury could be sports specific, with upper limb injuries predominant in throwers and bowlers, while lower limb injuries predominate in games such as football. In a previous written report by united states in 2016,7 we evaluated the incidence of knee injuries in 24 different sports in India, in a study spanning 5 years. Similar to other studies, we observed a significantly higher injury rate during competition as compared to injuries during training. However, nosotros found that a noncontact mechanism of injury was more than predominant, with soccer and kabaddi injuries being the 2 almost prevalent. In addition, we found that of all the injured athletes, only 39.8% returned to the sport, a effigy significantly lower than a recent metaanalysis that showed 83% of athletes returning to their respective sport.8 Dhillon et al.ix in a focused review of 76 kabaddi players noted that 88.sixteen% of knee injuries occurred during competitive sports and the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) was injured in 89.47%; the sole issue was a presentation to treating surgeons adequately belatedly, after a mean duration of xiv.iv months after the injury episode. The fourth dimension lost from sport averaged 16.six months, with inadequate rehabilitation protocols being documented. A detailed analysis of the lower render to sports rate in India is beyond the scope of this newspaper; even so, nosotros tin state that farther studies are needed to examine and critique the injury management, rehabilitation, and return to contest programs and protocols administered in our country to shed light on the possible shortcomings.
It is evident that injuries and returning to the sport after that are major concerns amid athletes and their treating clinicians, with a take chances-free render to the competition existence the peak priority of rehabilitation. This review aims to present an evidence-based arroyo to sports injuries followed the world over, incorporating that loftier-quality interventions and protocols initiated minutes after an astute injury, up to the time the athlete fully returns to competition. It serves every bit a framework upon which readers can construct individualized rehabilitation programs for athletes at all levels, as a perfect recipe protocol does non exist.
The Framework of Sports Injury Rehabilitation
The team approach and proper planning
In modern sports injury management, a team approach involving the sports physician, physiotherapist, force and workout coaches, sports psychologist, nutritionist, motorcoach, and the athlete is critical. Most importantly the rehabilitation needs to follow a biopsychosocial approach.10 Nosotros need an understanding of the sport and what biomechanical and physiological demands this has on the athlete. Therefore, reviewing the current literature regarding the particular sport will aid in providing the clinicians with the understanding of common types of injury, the mechanism behind them, and the current management protocols being used globally. Documentation of baseline measures is paramount to compare outcomes to a preinjury level. Baseline measures are usually undertaken during the preparticipation assessments and ideally done at the get-go of the sporting season. The rehabilitation team tin can then use these equally a guide when making any decision regarding return to competition.
Aims of rehabilitation and planning
The principal aim is a return to sports at a preinjury concrete and emotional level and to forbid reinjury. Information technology is important to have an stop goal in heed, preferably using baseline measures and player attributes documented at preparticipation, and work backward from where you want the role player to be. The central points in the rehabilitation programme should be planned and charted out.
In addition to injury-specific rehabilitation, it is important to eliminate risk factors and identify why the injury happened in the beginning place. Some other issue of note is the prevention of overall deconditioning, which has to be factored in when designing the rehabilitation protocol.
Restore office and performance to a preinjury level
For this, it is important to have baseline data in equally many athletes possible, thus signifying the importance of routine screening of athletes and the documentation of their physical condition. Nevertheless, this may not be possible at all levels in most Indian sports and is not available at the amateur level. Strength and conditioning should aim to achieve ability, forcefulness, and endurance somewhat higher than what information technology was preinjury, as we have to factor in preventive measures for reinjury.eleven
Safe return to the sport
Return to the sport can be interpreted differently past different members of the rehabilitation team; therefore, the clinician needs to specify in what capacity the athlete will exist returning. We need to transition from rehabilitation into competition gradually and then that athletes do not become injured as soon as they return. The player needs to complete a full grooming session with the squad a few days before game day and should be symptom gratuitous throughout the training. One argue is how much of the game he should play in his first lucifer later on recovery; this depends on the demands of the sport and the position that he plays. For case, a goalkeeper coming back from lower limb injury could play an entire game, whereas a heart forrard with the same injury could face up limited playing fourth dimension. Similarly, a goalkeeper with a shoulder injury volition take different transitions back into competition as compared to a center frontwards with a shoulder injury. This farther cements the statement for an individualized and tailored rehabilitation approach to athletes. Another determinant is the time of the competition and these players return; some phases, such as finals or playoffs of an important serial, require more concrete loads on the body compared to normal league games.12
Minimize risks of reinjury
Injury is the biggest risk factor for a reinjury. Once athletes are back competing, conscientious monitoring is required. The importance of monitoring the concrete load on players returning to competition is highlighted afterwards in the review, and further, reading on monitoring of astute-chronic workload ratio is highly recommended. Monitoring the concrete workload on athletes assists the clinicians in determining the optimum transition dorsum to sport while ensuring minimal reinjury risk.
Stages of Sports Injury Rehabilitation: Evidence-based Practice
For a good sports rehabilitation practitioner, the motto should exist "know the sport, review the literature." Once divers, the rehabilitation is broken into dissimilar stages, and the athlete progresses through them till he is fit to return to play (RTP). The rehabilitation is based on an active rehabilitation model, with the aim of avoiding prolonged immobilization, which has potentially detrimental effects on musculus tone, strength, and construction.thirteen The progression along the rehabilitation continuum and stages should be based on functional criteria instead of being time based, with sport-specific functional testing determining the progression to the side by side stage. The central factor, still, is tissue healing, and it is important to keep the natural healing process in mind while amalgam a program. Since the remodeling phase lasts for over a yr, it would exist wise to monitor the athlete and go on an ongoing strength and conditioning plan for equally long equally all fitness goals are not met. The team physician could employ pharmacological/medical interventions every bit advisable at each phase of the rehabilitation process.
Acute stage: Promote tissue healing and avoid deconditioning
Traditionally, clinicians have been employing a protocol inclusive of protection, rest, ice, pinch, and elevation (P.R.I.C.E) with the aim of avoiding further tissue damage, reducing associated pain, edema, and endeavour to promote the healing procedure.14 Although an effective protocol for the general population, immobilization, and balance could potentially take a detrimental effect on muscle tone and strength in these sportspersons, it could negatively affect athletes aiming to return to a preinjury level of participation.13 Moreover, elite athletes are expected to return to competition at the earliest possible fourth dimension and therefore require a different, more aggressive arroyo to rehabilitation, which needs to be initiated in the acute phase itself. Keeping the end goal of adventure-complimentary injury performance, it is proposed that clinicians follow a protocol inclusive of protection, optimal loading, ice, compression, and elevation (P.O.L.I.C.East) in the astute care setting for athletes.15 Since early mobilization and tissue loading has shown to have a positive result to promote collagen reorganization and tissue healing,xvi information technology is wise to initiate a loading program every bit soon every bit pain permits. Introductory loading should involve a render to full weight bearing, which can likewise be accomplished through hydrotherapy or weight-assisted treadmills.17 Owing to its pain inhibitory effects, isometric exercise makes another fantabulous choice as the offset line of tissue loading intervention.18 However, clinicians need to respect the natural healing processes of the body and ensure a balance between loading and timely unloading to avoid damaging the healing tissue. Obviously, nosotros need to protect the injured tissue from further damage, only we cannot allow detraining in the other areas, and simultaneous conditioning of the rest of the body needs to go along. Despite their being only Level 4 and Level Five studies, depression-intensity pulsed ultrasound and neuromuscular electric stimulation are still used in the clinical setting in an try to manage inflammation and promote tissue healing.19 ,20
In addition to the physical requirements, the multidisciplinary squad needs to address the mental and emotional demands of elite sport as well. It is recommended that elite athletes undergo psychologically21 and nutritional interventions22 early in the program, to ensure all well-being, and provide the injured tissues with high quality nutrients to allow optimum healing. Progression of interventions to the next phase of rehabilitation is strictly based on achieving a predetermined set of functional criteria, timelines of which would differ regarding individual athletes. Tabular array one shows an example of such predetermined criteria that an athlete with a muscle injury would need to full fill to progress to the side by side phase in the rehabilitation continuum.23 Although there is no Level I evidence validating the progression criteria, the clinicians should be guided past their knowledge of the specific sport, the healing process, and sound clinical reasoning to brand an informed decision.
Table 1
Progression criteria for a muscle injury
Details of medical intervention during rehabilitation such as medication, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and injections are across the scope of this review. Nonetheless, many issues come into play and the occasional utilise of steroid injections for some acute weather condition, or platelet-rich plasma injections for some healing situations are something to exist kept in mind. Nutritional optimization is essential for healing and over again is across the scope of the current article.
Reconditioning phase
Rehabilitation involving strength and workout in athletes could exist highly variable as compared to the general population. Rupture or injury to the ACL is one of the almost common lower limb injuries seen in sports, with potential career ending outcomes as some athletes may neglect to accomplish preinjury level of functioning.24 Reinjury and graft rupture take been reported every bit a effect of returning to play besides early resulting in excessive load on a poorly rehabilitated knee.25 Therefore, it is highly important to continuously monitor the athlete rehabilitation to ensure optimum loading of injured and recovering tissues through an individualized approach according to the sport and its concrete need.26 Due to the physical demands of loftier-level sports, graded load progression plays a significant function in a successful sports injury rehabilitation program.27 Cardiorespiratory loading to maintain and improve aerobic capacity, in conjunction with neuromuscular training to maintain overall muscle strength, flexibility, and proprioception, has been well defined in literature.28 ,29 In improver, various sports-specific speed, force, agility, and flexibility drills, when incorporated early on in the rehabilitation, have proven to exist effective in the initial stages in fugitive overall deconditioning and positively affecting return to participation. While progressive loading plays a key part in an efficient RTP, the clinicians need to monitor for undue overloading. In a systemic review in 2016, Drew and Finch30 demonstrated a pregnant human relationship betwixt excessive training loads and risk of reinjury. However, their review also exhibited a protective outcome confronting injury when optimal loading was employed. Weiss et al.31 found a like correlation, with their report demonstrating an increase in injury with excessive loading in professional basketball players. Load monitoring using devices such as global positioning satellite (GPS) and accelerometers (external) and rate of perceived exertion (RPE) and heart charge per unit monitoring (internal) are commonly employed in the US, the UK, Australia and are methods that should be considered at various levels in India also. To monitor the athletes for optimal loading in sports rehabilitation, many authors have recommending monitoring the workload through determination of the acute-chronic (A/C) workload ratio, which assists in avoiding any sudden spikes in training book and intensity, which could potentially result in reinjury. The A/C workload ratio is divers as the training load during the current week divided past the boilerplate of training load in the four preceding weeks.32 Blanch and Gabbett32 recommend an A/C workload ratio between one.0 and 1.five with a college ratio associated with higher reinjury risk. The A/C workload ratio besides helps the clinicians to determine the amount of training the athletes have undergone during their rehabilitation and whether information technology was enough to meet the demands of their corresponding sport. For instance, a cricketer who has been bowling an average of 120 assurance in training/rehabilitation over the past 4 weeks and has to bowl 240 balls in his render to match participation will have an A/C workload ratio of 2.0 that puts him at college risk of reinjury. The rehabilitation squad is thus also tasked with monitoring any acute spikes in the A/C workload ratio, all the while safely ensuring an overload of 10%–15%;33 this involves good coordination with the team coach/manager also. The incorporation of vesture sensory technology such every bit accelerometers and GPS devices allows the clinicians and athlete to monitor their physiological load and movement patterns both in preparation and competition and assist in preventing reinjury by keeping the load need in cheque, all the while aiding in a timely RTP.34
Render to sport
Once the rehabilitation criteria for the reconditioning phase have been fulfilled, a decision to RTP needs to exist taken. As a clinician and a member of the rehabilitation team, it is important to understand that the determination of returning to the sport is non ane taken in isolation. Although a collaborative decision needs to exist made past the entire rehabilitation team, the athlete himself is the final estimate on RTP. Yet, the responsibility of a safe and timely return to sport lies on the shoulders of the clinicians and coaches in the rehabilitation team. The strategic cess of risk and run a risk tolerance (StAART) is a theoretical framework that aids the clinicians in making informed decisions while gradually returning the athletes to their respective sport.12 Figure one demonstrates the three-footstep framework which assists sports injury clinicians to gauge risks associated with short and long term outcomes associated with the sport.
Strategic assessment of adventure and adventure tolerance protocol (Modified from Shrier 2015)
To ensure a graded progression of concrete demands of the sport, Creighton et al.35 proposed a continuum that would see the athlete return to participation, return to sport, and render to competition. The rehabilitation team should be well aware of the demands of the sport, the potential risks involved, and the time of participation before making their final decision. Return to participation ideally involves the athlete training with the team to include sports specific training to the ongoing rehabilitation. Load monitoring at this stage is vital to forbid sudden peaks in acute grooming load and avoid reinjury or any potential new injuries. Once the athlete has undergone an incident-free training session, a partial return to sport is recommended, which may include non playing an unabridged game or coming on every bit a substitute, to avoid a sudden increase in acute workload.32
With the StAART framework equally a guide, the athletes need to exist clinically assessed for RTP that should test their physical and psychological readiness.36 ,37 Functional testing, inclusive of a battery of sport-specific tests assessing both open up and closed skills, is essential to determine whether the athlete tin meet the physical demands of the sport without sustaining a reinjury.38 ,39 In addition, the ACL return to sport after injury calibration has shown to be an efficient issue measure to determine the psychological readiness of athletes returning to the sport after ACL reconstruction.forty Tabular array two demonstrates some of the criteria that demand to be fulfilled to render to the sport later common injuries. As these criteria are highly variable and based on the injured tissue, the severity of the injury, and the blazon of sport, it is highly advised that the treating clinicians familiarize themselves with the demands of the game and with electric current literature available to guide with successful rehabilitation.
Table 2
Criteria that need to be fulfilled to render to the sport
Prevention of reinjury
A previous injury is the highest predictor of a risk of reinjury,3 and therefore, information technology is extremely important to monitor the athlete even when he has gone back to full participation. A meta-analysis conducted by Soomro et al.41 highlighted the efficacy of injury prevention programs (IPPs) in adolescent team sports. The authors attributed the success of IPPs to meliorate muscular strength, flexibility, and proprioceptive remainder. In addition to incorporating IPPs in athletes returning to elite levels, ongoing load monitoring is also highly recommended. IPPs such as the FIFA eleven and the FIFA xi+ protocol focus on strength, flexibility, and core stabilization, are highly recommended for the prevention of master injuries as well every bit reinjury in recovering soccer players.42 Although injury prevention interventions through practice programs, biomechanical assessments, protective equipment, and rule changes may accept yielded positive results, there is nevertheless no high-quality bear witness in back up of screening for injury risk.43 Periodic wellness examinations aid sports injury clinicians in measuring the modifiable factors such as strength, range of movement and movement analysis, and the absence of any intervention studies in support of screening for arguable risks which makes it near impossible to predict sports injuries. Further high-quality research is needed to examine the properties of various screening tests being used in clinical sports medicine setting.
Conclusions
Rehabilitation after a sports injury is a crucial aspect to ensure total recovery, minimize time off from sports, and to prevent reinjury. Mod rehabilitation methods accept surpassed traditional management protocols and are based on an active rehabilitation framework that demands equal participation from the athlete and the entire rehabilitation team. Attempts are made to ensure the primeval RTP, and even though the sports clinicians are responsible for a safety transition back to competition, it is important to remember that the athlete has the last say. The role of surgical interventions, as well as pharmaceutical requirements, is demand based and beyond the scope of this manuscript, but the major work on a sportsperson after injury is done by the rehabilitation team. In addition, i must non ignore nutritional supplementation and psychological intervention, which have a major role in getting the athlete back to full fettle, along with injury-complimentary return to sports at the same level when he was injured.
Financial support and sponsorship
Nil.
Conflicts of involvement
There are no conflicts of involvement.
References
1. Fullagar HH, McCunn R, Murray A. An updated review of the applied physiology of American collegiate football: The physical demands, strength/Conditioning, nutritional considerations and injury characteristics of America'due south favourite game. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2017;24,:1–27. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
2. Ardern CL, Glasgow P, Schneiders A, Witvrouw E, Clarsen B, Cools A, et al. Consensus argument on return to sport from the Showtime World Congress in Sports Physical Therapy, Berne. Br J Sports Med. 2016;fifty:853–64. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
iii. Hootman JM, Dick R, Agel J. Epidemiology of collegiate injuries for xv sports: Summary and recommendations for injury prevention initiatives. J Athl Train. 2007;42:311–ix. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
4. Dhillon MS, Garg B, Soni RK, Dhillon H, Prabhakar S. Nature and incidence of upper limb injuries in professional cricket players a prospective observation. Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Ther Technol. 2012;iv:42–46. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
v. Orchard JW, Kountouris A, Sims K. Incidence and prevalence of aristocracy male cricket injuries using updated consensus definitions. Open Admission J Sports Med. 2016;7:187–94. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
half-dozen. Tirabassi J, Brou L, Khodaee Thousand, Lefort R, Fields SK, Comstock RD, et al. Epidemiology of high school sports-related injuries resulting in medical disqualification: 2005-2006 through 2013-2014 academic years. Am J Sports Med. 2016;44:2925–32. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
7. John R, Dhillon MS, Syam K, Prabhakar S, Behera P, Singh H, et al. Epidemiological contour of sports-related knee injuries in Northern India: An observational report at a tertiary intendance heart. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2016;vii:207–eleven. [PMC gratis article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
viii. Lai CC, Ardern CL, Feller JA, Webster KE. Eighty-3 per cent of elite athletes render to preinjury sport after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A systematic review with meta-analysis of return to sport rates, graft rupture rates and performance outcomes. Br J Sports Med. 2017 Feb 21; pii: bjsports-2016-096836. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2016-096836. [Epub ahead of impress] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
9. Dhillon MS, John R, Sharma Due south, Prabhakar S, Behera P, Saxena S, et al. Epidemiology of knee joint injuries in Indian Kabaddi players. Asian J Sports Med. 2017;8(i):e31670. [DOI: 10.5812/asjsm.31670] [Google Scholar]
ten. von Rosen P, Frohm A, Kottorp A, Fridén C, Heijne A. Multiple factors explain injury chance in adolescent elite athletes: Applying a biopsychosocial perspective. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2017 doi: 10.1111/sms.12855. [Epub ahead of impress] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
11. Undheim MB, Cosgrave C, King Eastward, Strike S, Marshall B, Falvey É, et al. Isokinetic musculus strength and readiness to render to sport following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Is there an association? A systematic review and a protocol recommendation. Br J Sports Med. 2015;49:1305–x. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
12. Shrier I. Strategic assessment of gamble and risk tolerance (StARRT) framework for render-to-play conclusion-making. Br J Sports Med. 2015;49:1311–v. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
xiii. Booth FW. Physiologic and biochemical effects of immobilization on musculus. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1987;219:15–20. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
xiv. Yu H, Randhawa Yard, Côté P. Optima Collaboration. The effectiveness of physical agents for lower-limb soft tissue injuries: A systematic review. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2016;46:523–54. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
15. Bleakley CM, Glasgow P, MacAuley DC. PRICE needs updating, should we call the Constabulary? Br J Sports Med. 2012;46:220–ane. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
xvi. Kjaer Yard, Langberg H, Heinemeier K, Bayer ML, Hansen Yard, Holm L, et al. From mechanical loading to collagen synthesis, structural changes and function in man tendon. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2009;19:500–10. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
17. Villalta EM, Peiris CL. Early aquatic physical therapy improves role and does not increase take chances of wound-related adverse events for adults after orthopedic surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;94:138–48. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
18. Rio E, Kidgell D, Purdam C, Gaida J, Moseley GL, Pearce AJ, et al. Isometric exercise induces analgesia and reduces inhibition in patellar tendinopathy. Br J Sports Med. 2015;49:1277–83. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
19. Hannemann PF, Mommers EH, Schots JP, Brink PR, Poeze M. The furnishings of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound and pulsed electromagnetic fields bone growth stimulation in acute fractures: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2014;134:1093–106. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
20. Malone JK, Blake C, Caulfield BM. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation during recovery from exercise: A systematic review. J Force Cond Res. 2014;28:2478–506. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
21. Ivarsson A, Tranaeus U, Johnson U, Stenling A. Negative psychological responses of injury and rehabilitation adherence effects on return to play in competitive athletes: A systematic review and meta-assay. Open up Admission J Sports Med. 2017;eight:27–32. [PMC gratis article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
22. Russell L. The importance of patients' nutritional condition in wound healing. Br J Nurs. 2001;x:S42, S44–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
23. Maniar N, Shield AJ, Williams MD, Timmins RG, Opar DA. Hamstring strength and flexibility after hamstring strain injury: A systematic review and meta-assay. Br J Sports Med. 2016;50:909–20. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
24. Dodson CC, Secrist ES, Bhat SB, Forest DP, Deluca PF. Anterior cruciate ligament injuries in national football league athletes from 2010 to 2013: A descriptive epidemiology study. Orthop J Sports Med. 2016;4:2325967116631949. doi: x.1177/eCollection2016. [PMC free commodity] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
25. Kyritsis P, Bahr R, Landreau P, Miladi R, Witvrouw E. Likelihood of ACL graft rupture: Non meeting six clinical discharge criteria earlier return to sport is associated with a 4 times greater run a risk of rupture. Br J Sports Med. 2016;fifty:946–51. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
26. Mai HT, Chun DS, Schneider Advertizing, Erickson BJ, Freshman RD, Kester B, et al. Operation-based outcomes after inductive cruciate ligament reconstruction in professional athletes differ between sports. Am J Sports Med. 2017;May 1:363546517704834. doi: 10.1177/0363546517704834. [Epub ahead of print] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
27. Bohm South, Mersmann F, Arampatzis A. Human being tendon accommodation in response to mechanical loading: A systematic review and meta-assay of practice intervention studies on healthy adults. Sports Med Open up. 2015;ane:7. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
28. Della Villa Southward, Boldrini L, Ricci G, Danelon F, Snyder-Mackler L, Nanni K, et al. Clinical outcomes and render-to-sports participation of 50 soccer players after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction through a sport-specific rehabilitation protocol. Sports Health. 2012;four:17–24. [PMC free commodity] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
29. Taylor KL, Sheppard JM, Lee H, Plummer Northward. Negative effect of static stretching restored when combined with a sport specific warm-up component. J Sci Med Sport. 2009;12:657–61. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
30. Drew MK, Finch CF. The relationship between training load and injury, illness and soreness: A systematic and literature review. Sports Med. 2016;46:861–83. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
31. Weiss KJ, Allen SV, McGuigan MR, Whatman CS. The relationship between grooming load and injury in men's professional basketball players. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2017;2:1–20. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
32. Blanch P, Gabbett TJ. Has the athlete trained enough to return to play safely? The acute: Chronic workload ratio permits clinicians to quantify a role player's chance of subsequent injury. Br J Sports Med. 2016;50:471–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
33. Gabbett TJ. The training-injury prevention paradox: Should athletes be training smarter and harder? Br J Sports Med. 2016;fifty:273–lxxx. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
34. Li RT, Kling SR, Salata MJ, Cupp SA, Sheehan J, Voos JE, et al. Clothing operation devices in sports medicine. Sports Wellness. 2016;8:74–eight. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
35. Creighton DW, Shrier I, Shultz R, Meeuwisse WH, Matheson GO. Return-to-play in sport: A decision-based model. Clin J Sport Med. 2010;20:379–85. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
36. Ardern CL, Österberg A, Tagesson Due south, Gauffin H, Webster KE, Kvist J, et al. The bear upon of psychological readiness to return to sport and recreational activities after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Br J Sports Med. 2014;48:1613–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
37. Glazer DD. Development and preliminary validation of the injury-psychological readiness to return to sport (I-PRRS) scale. J Athl Train. 2009;44:185–9. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
38. Lockie RG, Jeffriess MD, McGann TS, Callaghan SJ, Schultz AB. Planned and reactive agility functioning in semiprofessional and amateur basketball game players. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2014;9:766–71. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
39. Gabbett T, Benton D. Reactive agility of rugby league players. J Sci Med Sport. 2009;12:212–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
40. Slagers AJ, Reininga IH, van den Akker-Scheek I. The Dutch language anterior cruciate ligament return to sport later injury scale (ACL-RSI)-Validity and reliability. J Sports Sci. 2017;35:393–401. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
41. Soomro North, Sanders R, Hackett D, Hubka T, Ebrahimi South, Freeston J, et al. The efficacy of injury prevention programs in adolescent team sports: A meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2016;44:2415–24. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
42. Thorborg Chiliad, Krommes KK, Esteve E, Clausen MB, Bartels EM, Rathleff MS, et al. Consequence of specific exercise-based football injury prevention programmes on the overall injury rate in football: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the FIFA xi and 11+ programmes. Br J Sports Med. 2017;51:562–71. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
43. Bahr R. Why screening tests to predict injury do not piece of work-and probably never will: A disquisitional review. Br J Sports Med. 2016;50:776–80. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Articles from Indian Journal of Orthopaedics are provided here courtesy of Indian Orthopaedic Clan
Source: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5609374/
0 Response to "Pressure to Return to Sport After Injury Peer Reviewed Articles"
Post a Comment